Subject: lapackers
List archive
- From: "Langou, Julien" <Julien.Langou@ucdenver.edu>
- To: lapackers <lapackers@cs.utk.edu>, lapackers <lapackers@cs.berkeley.edu>, "lapack-dev@googlegroups.com" <lapack-dev@googlegroups.com>
- Subject: [lapackers] Re: [Lapackers] LAPACK 3.4.0 and ScaLAPACK 2.0
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:47:03 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
Agree with all what Rodney is saying. (Thanks Rodney.)
For MRRR perf,
1) there is plenty of perf in LAWN #195, (from 2007)
2) I just sent a driver to Rodney to do this. For a machine, would be nice to
run this at Boulder on their big cluster!!! We'll see.
Julien.
On Oct 13, 2011, at 12:31 PM, James, Rodney wrote:
> Hi Julie,
>
> - The LAPACK QZ is a long way off, hopefully it will be there for SC12
>
> - ScaLAPACK Nonsymmetric Eigenvalue Problem (QR) codeā¦.the double precision
> works, and I am working on a single precision version. We are missing
> complex versions, and the necessary routines for computing the eigenvectors
> - unless we can get this code from Bo Kagstrom, if it even exists, the only
> parts that can be ready by SC11 will be the real (single and double)
> eigenvalue computation.
>
> - ScaLAPACK CAQR will not be ready until early next year.
>
> - ScaLAPACK LDLT, I could do this at some point, but not in time for SC11.
> If Berkley doesn't get to it first, I will do the LDLT at the same time I
> do the CAQR.
>
> - ScaLAPACK 2.0 release notes - I will put this together
>
> - ScaLAPACK benchmarking for MRRR. I would be happy to do this if I had
> access to a large parallel distributed machine. The largest machine I have
> access to is my quad core 8GB Mac Pro that sits on my desk. If someone
> can get me access to a larger machine, I will get performance numbers for
> MRRR against the existing ScaLAPACK SEP code.
>
> - CMAKE and Installer for ScaLAPACK - probably better for you (Julie) to do
> this. I have no experience at all with cmake or ScaLAPACK installer.
>
> Rodney
>
>
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 9:44 AM, julie langou wrote:
>
>>> Dear lapackers,
>>> It is time to freeze what will go in the LAPACK and ScaLAPACK releases as
>>> we need to prepare the posters for SC11.
>>> Below is a draft of the Release Notes for LAPACK 3.4.0. This contains
>>> what is already in.
>>> Please let me know if you have some codes that will be ready for mid
>>> November:
>>> - [UCD] status of LAPACK QZ, ScaLAPACK QR, ScaLAPACK CAQR
>>> - [UC Berkley] status of Craig's algo integration
>>> - [somebody?] ScaLAPACK LDLT
>>>
>>> For ScaLAPACK, Rodney, I would need a detailed section on the change for
>>> ScaLAPACK 2.0. Also we need to coordinate the update of the ScaLAPACK
>>> installer and the creation of a new CMAKE build system for ScaLAPACK. I
>>> am fine working on it, but just let me know.
>>> Again for Rodney, we need some performance on MRRR. Did you have time to
>>> get some, if not, same, I can take care of it.
>>>
>>> Regarding LAPACKE, INTEL did not send us yet the new version. I will
>>> contact them.
>>> Let me know if you have any questions about the next LAPACK and ScaLAPACK
>>> releases.
>>> Regards,
>>> Julie
>>
>
- [lapackers] LAPACK 3.4.0 and ScaLAPACK 2.0, julie langou, 10/13/2011
- Message not available
- [lapackers] Re: [Lapackers] LAPACK 3.4.0 and ScaLAPACK 2.0, Langou, Julien, 10/13/2011
- Message not available
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.